Curse

spyke136 · Aug 06, 2008, 12:08 AM // 00:08

Okay how about Asura/Norn/Vanguard/Delver/SS/LB are all account based for characters which have completed their respective campaign.

so you dont start out with max norn, but it gets "unlocked" once you beat EoTN because you already maxed it on another character.

pamelf · Aug 06, 2008, 12:33 AM // 00:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by spyke136

Okay how about Asura/Norn/Vanguard/Delver/SS/LB are all account based for characters which have completed their respective campaign.

so you dont start out with max norn, but it gets "unlocked" once you beat EoTN because you already maxed it on another character.

Yes, I approve. That would definitely be a good way to go.

pumpkin pie · Aug 06, 2008, 05:39 AM // 05:39

this thread has to be closed now since the latest HoM update.

pamelf · Aug 06, 2008, 07:08 AM // 07:08

no, why? They can only be DISPLAYED through account, it doesn't mean every character on your account has them...

R.Shayne · Aug 06, 2008, 06:21 PM // 18:21

I hate titles and I hate the fact that in order to get all the armor I want I will have to turn in 14 books just to get to rank 5 in a bunch of titles. I have ten characters and I do not have a main character so please stop punishing me for my play style.

I could not possible care less about getting “GWAM” or who has it and if you are actually crying because someone else is going to get your title, please uninstall the game.

Molock · Aug 07, 2008, 02:57 AM // 02:57

/not signed

I would /sign if the update took the highest rank and gave to it all characters. I have another problem with this too "look at my level 1 KoaBD".

Kanyatta · Aug 07, 2008, 03:52 AM // 03:52

The only reason anyone could possibly /notsign this is either

A) I <3 Grind!

or

B) It might make my massive dick look small.

pumpkin pie · Aug 07, 2008, 09:52 AM // 09:52

from what everyone who signed this claim, basically

1) you don't want to grind right. don't tell me now that its not what you want.
2) you don't like epeen? see useless post above

but then all that you ask for are epeen stuffs that if you don't like grind and don't care for epeen you don't even have to bother playing anymore, but you continue to QQ and whine to get these stuffs you continuously says is "epeen that you don't want" .. why?

so I move for this thread to closed ... because

ARENA NET ALREADY MEET THESE EPEENERS HALF WAY BY MODIFYING THE HOM TO BE TOGGLEABLE BETWEEN ACCOUNT BASE AND CHARACTERS BASE .

MithranArkanere · Aug 07, 2008, 04:43 PM // 16:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by pumpkin pie

this thread has to be closed now since the latest HoM update.

Latest? That has not been done yet, and we don't even know HOW will it be made.

wu is me · Apr 14, 2009, 01:00 AM // 01:00

Well since the October update, wisdom and treasure hunter are now account based (for which I'm extremely grateful-since i no longer need to chest run on my monk main, and am spared the inconvenience of managing gold item logistics =D).

But I'm a little confused over the logic they used to decide that Sweet Tooth, party animal and Drunk tard were sufficiently different situation to Wisdom such that they didn't decide that making them account based was a good idea.

Both titles are in the same situation as Wisdom... however cost about one third of the cost of Wisdom....
They share the inconvenience of having to transfer items for usage, and with the additional inconvenience being the fact that you can only have a party on your main.

The only other thing is the cost...

rick1027 · Apr 14, 2009, 04:06 PM // 16:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by spyke136

Okay how about Asura/Norn/Vanguard/Delver/SS/LB are all account based for characters which have completed their respective campaign.

so you dont start out with max norn, but it gets "unlocked" once you beat EoTN because you already maxed it on another character.

i like this idea the max title not being unlocked til you finish the campaign and having these titles account based although i think they should up the title max number on all of them to at least double what they are now or better

Ryu_ookami · Apr 14, 2009, 06:38 PM // 18:38

sunbringer will amost certainly never be account based as it would effect the story line and the questline i.e get to sunspear rank 1 etc

headlesshobbs · Apr 14, 2009, 07:29 PM // 19:29

Does anyone find it really annoying you don't have Drunk or Sweettooth titles account based? I don't use them on my main, but another character I made earlier has already built up in this area.

1337 H4X · Apr 15, 2009, 08:40 AM // 08:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by headlesshobbs

Does anyone find it really annoying you don't have Drunk or Sweettooth titles account based? I don't use them on my main, but another character I made earlier has already built up in this area.

No, thats like saying everyone in a family are ale hounds, when only the father is an alchoholic

Eragon Zarroc · Apr 15, 2009, 01:44 PM // 13:44

it can be claimed that all titles are grinding, just with varying degrees of grind time. stop QQ'ing and just play on a single character =P

Lourens · Apr 16, 2009, 12:58 PM // 12:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eragon Zarroc

it can be claimed that all titles are grinding, just with varying degrees of grind time. stop QQ'ing and just play on a single character =P

I agree with this , for example the guardian titles and cartographer titles may not require you to kill loads of enemies but you need to kill a lot of time in order to complete them so theyre grinds to

.

MithranArkanere · Apr 16, 2009, 04:47 PM // 16:47

Nah. 'Grind' is when you make the very same thing over and over.

Guardians require to kill different enemies in different regions while fullfilling different conditions. Each point is different and can't be acquired twice by the same character.

That's not 'grind'.

Lourens · Apr 16, 2009, 07:14 PM // 19:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by MithranArkanere

Nah. 'Grind' is when you make the very same thing over and over.

Guardians require to kill different enemies in different regions while fullfilling different conditions. Each point is different and can't be acquired twice by the same character.

That's not 'grind'.

Fine then maybe not all titles are a grind.

They're all killing time and if you would make them account based it would save you a lot of time if your having a lot of other characters that you consider to be important.

Pukachu · May 08, 2010, 01:25 PM // 13:25

I agree that drunkard, sweets and party points should be account based. For two reasons
1) Each title requires you spend an obscene amount of time and money (if you are buying all the points)
2) When farming on other chars besides my main title char, it is extremely helpful to be able to use the buffs that sweet items like cupcakes, candies etc provide I am reluctant to use them since I will be wasting points towards the title.

As for the other titles. Lb/SS are both very easy to achieve. They are plenty of options for farming them and vq's on top of that.
The eotn titles are the same, if you were going to do LMotN anyway, by the time you've finished nm,hm, dungeons nm and hm and the vqs you should've almost maxed everyone of them.

Thats my opinion anyway.

SpiritThief · Dec 20, 2010, 12:31 AM // 00:31

This really needs a second thought now looking at the way the HoM rewards are account based in the end anyway.

For things like Drunkard, sweets, party etc.